RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About me
  • Imprint & Legal Stuff
  • Recommended
  •  

    Will Google Chrome OS support other browsers than Chrome?

    July 12th, 2009

    It’s almost a week old news that Google plans to release an own operating system based on the Chrome browser in the next year. After thinking about it for a while I came to the point were I have to ask the following question:

    Will Google Chrome OS support other browsers than Chrome?

    Basically a lot of people complained about Microsoft that they are bundling their own browser Internet Explorer with their operating system. But what about an operating system which basically IS a browser? Is it different, or will it be possible e.g. to install a Firefox to Chrome OS?

    I dont’t know the answer yet, but I’m very curious if Google will become a second Microsoft in terms of OS.


    Microsoft’s New Search Engine Bing.com

    June 1st, 2009

    Announced a few days ago, now it is available to the public: Microsoft started their new search at Bing.com.

    It looks very similar to Google and offers similar functionalities: you can search for Websites, Images, Videos, Shopping, News, Maps, etc.

    Mobile

    When browsing the site with my Android G1 there was no mobile version of the site available, so I had to stick with the large site on my small screen.

    Search Results

    I did some initial searches for obvious stuff: I searched for Krahn or Christian Krahn in order to find my blog(s). The german version was no problem but I had difficulties finding krahn.org. One reason is that Bing forces you to use search results connected to your geographic location (which is germany for me) but my english blog is hosted with an .org domain, so Bing might think it’s not relevant to me. Well, wrong in my case.

    bing_christiankrahn

    Another thing I searched for is “Branchenbuch” (english translation would be “industry directory” directory, but more likely “yellow pages”). Obviously Bing uses other characteristics to rank pages, as the webpage of my employe klicktel.de is only being found on page 2 on Bling while being on the top results on Google. Guess that means more work for our SEO guys to find out how to improve “Bing rank“.

    Maps

    First thing that was strange is Bing Maps is not working in the Chrome browser. Hopefully that will be fixed soon. Other than that the maps implementation is similar to other sites like Google Maps or klicktel.de, map material is a bit out of date as on all the other sites. I like the implementation of the eagle view perspective on their site as the images seems to be a bit more up to date and you can pan to the next area and it automatically updates the image to that area. That’s something currently not possible in the klickTel version.

    bing_map

    Other stuff

    I will do some more checking on the other features. Currently it seems to me that Microsoft just made a copy of the current Google features (frontend) with their own backend behind it. Another thing that leads to that opinion is that Bing.com has the same spots for ads like Google (with AdWords).

    bing_ads1

    Let’s see how it developes…


    Google AdWords API 2009 – Overview and First Thoughts

    May 19th, 2009

    Just recently Google made the new AdWords API 2009 sandbox and documentation available to the public. Some information about it is also in the AdWords API Blog.

    I have started to toy around with it. I have written a mayor part of the current AdWords API integration for the company I work for, so it’s best to be prepared for the mayor overhaul Google has done with this new API implementation. Here is a quick overview and some thoughts I have about it.

    Authentication

    Google seems to unify the use of their APIs with a common login interface: the Account Authentication API. You can make a HTTPS Post Request to the API and use your Google credentials to get an Auth token. This token then will be used to access the functionalities of the API.

    I think it is good to unify different kinds of API authentication into a single login service. I just hope that it is stable enough to endure all the load from not just one kind of service but every piece of Google API which will make use of it.

    Accessing the Sandbox

    I created some example codes (will publish some code in another article soon) to access the Google AdWords Sandbox. At first I had some difficulties because I don’t just use the examples from Google, I created my own kind of library to access the API. That lead to the assumption that I can always use the SOAP end url as namespace – which was wrong because the namespace for the request XML has to be

    https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v200902

    while the actual xml request is being sent to

    https://adwords-sandbox.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v200902/....

    When sending the wrong namespace the API returns a server error, but no detailed error code about what kind of error occured. I hope Google will improve their error reporting there.

    Get & Mutate – the new methods of getting data and manipulating data

    Past versions of the AdWords API left the impression of a patchwork API. This time you basically have two functions:

    get

    Getting data is simple: just build an xml which contains all the parameters you need and send it to the API.

    Example:

    <get xmlns="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v200902">
     <selector>
      <StatsSelector>
       <campaignIds></campaignIds>
      </StatsSelector>
     </selector>
    </get>

    This piece of xml tells the API (assuming the header information with the AuthToken, sorry not posting that one here ;) ) to retrieve all the campaigns in the account. You can limit the campaigns by telling it to only include certain campaign IDs (filling the StatsSelecter/campaignIds node with subnodes containing the actual IDs).

    mutate

    Mutate is the method to create and manipulate data structures in the API.

    Example:

    <mutate xmlns="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v200902">
     <operations>
      <operator>ADD</operator>
      <operand>
       <name>Test Campaign - 1242726211</name>
       <status>PAUSED</status>
       <budget>
        <period>DAILY</period>
        <amount>
         <currencyCode>EUR</currencyCode>
         <microAmount>1000000</microAmount>
        </amount>
        <deliveryMethod>STANDARD</deliveryMethod>
       </budget>
      </operand>
     </operations>
    </mutate>

    It tells the API to create a new campaign in the account defined by the client email in the header (again not posted here). The additional OPERATOR tells what kind of operation (ADD, REMOVE, SET). After that all the necessary data for the operation are being added.

    Final words (for now)

    I think the new API is very clean and straight forward, with a new authentication method. The problems I currently see is the amount of work necessary to migrate applications based on the existing API v13 to the new v2009, but if people are using frameworks like APIlity or one of the other provided libraries, it is safe to assume that new versions will be available soon after the release to make a smooth upgrade.

    I am looking forward to work closely with the new API.